[gentoo-dev] USE-flag gnome-keyring isn't accurate anymore

[Pacho Ramos]

I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in case
an implemention comes along that is named differently. How about
“secret-service”?

I think this is a good idea.

And "keyring"? I am not sure if users not familiar with "libsecret" will
understand what "secret*" means in this context

[Marek Szuba]

Post by Pacho Ramos

I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in case
an implemention comes along that is named differently. How about
“secret-service”?

I think this is a good idea.

And "keyring"? I am not sure if users not familiar with "libsecret" will
understand what "secret*" means in this context

Definitely a good idea. And I second "keyring", seeing as this term is also in use on other OSes.

[Marek Szuba]

Post by Pacho Ramos

I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in case
an implemention comes along that is named differently. How about
“secret-service”?

I think this is a good idea.

And "keyring"? I am not sure if users not familiar with "libsecret" will
understand what "secret*" means in this context

Definitely a good idea. And I second "keyring", seeing as this term is also in use on other OSes.

[John Johnson]

"keyring" conveys the appropriate meaning, imho.

Post by Marek Szuba

Post by Pacho Ramos

I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in

case

Post by Pacho Ramos

an implemention comes along that is named differently. How about
“secret-service”?

I think this is a good idea.

And "keyring"? I am not sure if users not familiar with "libsecret" will
understand what "secret*" means in this context

Definitely a good idea. And I second "keyring", seeing as this term is
also in use on other OSes.
--
Marecki

[Andreas Sturmlechner]

Post by John Johnson

Post by Marek Szuba

Post by Pacho Ramos

I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in
case an implemention comes along that is named differently. How about
“secret-service”?

I think this is a good idea.

And "keyring"? I am not sure if users not familiar with "libsecret" will
understand what "secret*" means in this context

Definitely a good idea. And I second "keyring", seeing as this term is
also in use on other OSes.
--
Marecki

"keyring" conveys the appropriate meaning, imho.

It seems that keyring won the popular vote. There is now a bug and a PR:

https://bugs.gentoo.org/905928
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/31035